# Vizelo.ai — Vizelo vs Peec AI: comparing GEO platforms
# Source: https://vizelo.ai/vizelo-vs-peec.html
# Last reviewed: 2026-05-26

### // Compare

# Vizelo vs Peec AI: comparing GEO platforms

Peec AI is the simpler, mostly European GEO platform — fast onboarding, clean UI, friendly to non-technical marketing teams. Vizelo is the deeper tool: six-engine coverage, integrated schema and llms.txt production, per-prompt competitor steal-lists. Same category, different shape.

Last reviewed 2026-05-26 from public docs + product testing.

### // TL;DR

## When to pick which.

- **Pick Peec AI** if your team is small, non-technical, primarily European, and wants the fastest possible time-to-first-citation-report without thinking about schema, JSON-LD, or llms.txt.
- **Pick Vizelo** if you want six-engine coverage as a first-class concern, an integrated schema + llms.txt + content-brief production workflow, deeper competitor steal-lists, and a free-forever tier to try without a sales call.
- **Pick both for a bake-off** only if you're genuinely undecided. They overlap heavily; long-term, one tool wins on this category.

### // Matrix

## Feature-by-feature.

**Answer-engine coverage**

| Capability | Vizelo | Peec AI |
|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | ✓ | ✓ |
| Perplexity | ✓ | ✓ |
| Google AI Overviews | ✓ hourly | ✓ daily |
| Bing Copilot | ✓ first-class | Partial |
| Claude.ai | ✓ first-class | Partial |
| Google Gemini | ✓ first-class | Partial |

**Citation intelligence**

| Capability | Vizelo | Peec AI |
|---|---|---|
| Per-prompt citation graph | ✓ | ✓ |
| Competitor citation steal-list | ✓ ranked | Partial |
| Brand sentiment in AI answers | ✓ | ✓ |
| Source-domain attribution | ✓ | Partial |

**Production workflow**

| Capability | Vizelo | Peec AI |
|---|---|---|
| Schema + JSON-LD one-click ship | ✓ integrated | — |
| llms.txt + AI sitemap generation | ✓ | — |
| Content briefs from AI demand signals | ✓ | Partial |
| Entity-completeness audit | ✓ | — |

**UX + onboarding**

| Capability | Vizelo | Peec AI |
|---|---|---|
| Time to first citation report | ~4 minutes | ~3 minutes |
| Designed for non-technical teams | Configurable simple mode | ✓ Primary |
| European-language UX | English-first | ✓ Multi-language |

**Workflow + integration**

| Capability | Vizelo | Peec AI |
|---|---|---|
| Public REST API | ✓ | Limited |
| Webhooks | ✓ | — |
| Slack alerts (per-prompt) | ✓ | Project-level |
| SSO + SCIM | ✓ Scale plan | Enterprise |

**Access**

| Capability | Vizelo | Peec AI |
|---|---|---|
| Free-forever tier | ✓ 25 prompts | Free trial only |
| Starting paid price | $49/mo | ~€39/mo |
| Never trains on customer data | ✓ contractual | ✓ |

### // Peec strengths

## Where Peec AI wins.

Three real strengths worth naming. First, simplicity: Peec's UI is deliberately stripped down for marketers who want a citation report, not a control surface. The fewer-clicks design genuinely helps non-technical teams get to value faster, and that's a category Vizelo has to work harder at by default because we expose more of the production layer. Second, European market fit: multi-language UX, EU data residency story, and a sales team that operates in EU time zones. If your buyer is in Berlin or Paris, Peec is the easier procurement conversation. Third, entry pricing: Peec's starting tier is slightly lower than ours in like-for-like terms, which matters for very small teams testing the category.

### // Vizelo strengths

## Where Vizelo wins.

The depth axis. Vizelo treats six engines — ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Bing Copilot, Claude, Gemini — as first-class citizens, with prompt-level depth and hourly refresh on the AI Overviews surface. We ship the schema and llms.txt from the dashboard, not just the recommendation; we generate JSON-LD that drops into your site; we run an entity-completeness audit across Wikipedia, Wikidata, Crunchbase, and LinkedIn. Peec is excellent at showing you the gap. We're built to close it. We also offer a real free-forever tier (25 prompts, not a 14-day trial), a documented public REST API, webhooks, and per-prompt Slack alerts — the integration surface a serious GEO program eventually needs.

### // Honesty

## What this comparison doesn't cover.

Two honest caveats. First, our depth is also our weight: a non-technical marketer evaluating both products on a 15-minute trial will probably find Peec faster to grok. We have a simpler default view that hides the schema and llms.txt surface, but the richer feature set is genuinely more to absorb. Second, if your buyer is European and EU data residency is a procurement gate, Peec has a more mature story there today. We're comfortable losing those deals; we'd rather Peec win the customers who want Peec than overstate our fit.

### // Pricing

## Pricing.

Vizelo: free forever for 25 tracked prompts, $49/mo starting paid tier, Scale tier with SSO/SCIM and higher API ceiling. Peec publishes plans in euros, typically starting in the €39/mo range for an entry tier, with team and enterprise tiers above. At small-team scale the two products are roughly comparable; at the scale where API access, webhooks, and SSO matter, Vizelo's feature ceiling is higher.

### FAQ

## Common questions about switching or dual-running.

**Can I use both Vizelo and Peec AI?**
Technically yes, but they cover the same category, so dual-running long-term means paying twice for citation tracking. The reasonable pattern is to run both for a short evaluation if you're undecided, then standardize on whichever fits the team's depth bar.

**How long does migration take?**
Connect a domain to Vizelo and the first scan runs in roughly four minutes. Moving a tracked prompt list across from Peec is usually an export + import that takes under an hour. Retraining the team on Vizelo's deeper UI typically takes a half-day; if your team is non-technical, give it a full day.

**Will I lose historical data if I switch?**
Citation history lives in whichever platform collected it. Peec's history stays in Peec. Vizelo starts a fresh timeline the day you connect. Export from Peec before churning if you need a continuous record for reporting.

**Does Vizelo replace Peec AI entirely?**
Functionally yes — Vizelo covers everything Peec covers and adds breadth on engine coverage, depth on the production workflow (schema, llms.txt, JSON-LD), and a free-forever tier. The honest counterpoint is that Peec's simplicity is a feature: if your team genuinely doesn't want or need the production-engineering surface, the simpler tool wins on time-to-value.

**What if my team is non-technical?**
Peec wins this one cleanly today; their UI is deliberately stripped down for marketers who don't want to think about schema. Vizelo's surface is richer because the work it enables — shipping JSON-LD, generating llms.txt, editing entity descriptions — is richer. We have an onboarding flow that hides the technical layer by default for non-technical teams, but if your team will never want to ship structured data, Peec is the more natural fit.

## See whether the answer engines recommend you.